In many selection processes, the presence of respected, experienced, or highly qualified individuals is interpreted as evidence that the process itself is serious and credible.
A respected individual may enter a selection process with the genuine intention of competing and being selected. Yet, without intending to do so, their participation may increase the perceived credibility of that process.
That credibility may then extend to its final outcome.
At this point, credibility is no longer merely a personal attribute. It may become a transferable organizational resource.
The question, therefore, is not only: Who was selected? We should also ask: Whose participation helped make the process—and ultimately its outcome—appear credible?
This takes the research one step closer to the hidden mechanism at its core:
This remains a research proposition rather than a proven conclusion. The next stages must test when such credibility transfer occurs, what conditions strengthen or interrupt it, and how it relates to established work on organizational legitimacy, impression management, signaling, endorsement, and decision-making.
